Wednesday, May 2, 2012

Research Essay: Morality: Morals in the Absence of Religion





 Morality: Morals in the Absence of Religion
Taylor Swank
Northern Illinois University











Abstract
Morality as it pertains to atheism and theism. Atheism is the lack of belief in a god, gods, or higher being. Theism is the strong belief in a god, gods, or higher being. Morality for the purpose of this essay is defined as the ability to make the distinction between right and wrong and being able to act upon that appropriately.  Atheism is more moral than theism for differing reasons, mainly that it has purer standards of morality. Atheism lacks fear of a higher being, unlike theism. It also is free from lust for rewards in the afterlife, as well as lacking blind obedience to the rules of a deity. Theism has all of these fears and wants, and is therefore less moral. This paper cites several articles, as well as using ideas from other sources that will listed at the end.
          Keywords: Theism, Atheism, Morality








Morality: Morality in the Absence of Religion
          Is atheism more moral than theism?  First, atheism versus theism must be defined, as must the definition of morality for the purpose of this comparison.  Atheism is the lack of belief in the presence of a supernatural being or any sort of afterlife, while theism is the strong belief in such a being and generally an afterlife.  Morality can be defined as understanding and acting according to the basis of right and wrong.   Essentially, atheism is a purer moral system than theism on the basis of beliefs and reasons for morality.  Each side has plenty of their own reasons for acting “morally”.  However, the argument can be made that the atheists are more moral because of the reasoning behind their morals. Atheists act morally out of such reasons as empathy, needs for survival based on cooperation, and even the want to help future generations. Theists act morally out of such reasons as fear of the higher being’s retribution, lust for a comfortable place in the afterlife, or out of blind obedience borne of not knowing differently. This is not to say that either side has no flaws, only that atheism has purer motives for being moral than does theism.
          In order to fully understand the ideas presented, theism and atheism must be fully explained, along with the definition of morality.  The definition of morality, for the purpose of this argument, is having the ability to make the distinction between right and wrong and to act upon this accordingly.  Morals are the views that humans have of what is right and wrong, and what is acceptable and what is not.  People have numerous different reasons for acting upon these codes.  Theism is the strong belief in a deity or supernatural being.  Theism primarily believes that a god or gods created the world and humanity. It states that everything there is was created by an omiscient being or beings.  There is also the belief that whatever deity or deities created the world and all in it, also gave humans moral codes to adhere to.  Depending on the religion, these moral codes differ slightly but remain generally the same.  However, not all religions work the same way or have the exact same belief system.  Now atheism, on the other hand, is the lack of belief in a supernatural power, higher being, or any sort of deity. Atheism denies the ideals of religion.  The beliefs in heaven, hell, purgatory, or any sort of afterlife tend to be absent.  Instead, atheists tend to believe in science and such things that have logical proof.  Therefore, atheists are more prone to belief in Evolution and The Big Bang Theory; ideas with scientific and logical settings that are more easily proven.  Not all atheists share the same ideas, however, but it can be generally said that atheists deny deities.
          Generally, religions attempt to teach what they see as good morality.     All religions have at least a slightly different view of what they teach as right and wrong, and moral and immoral.  Religions tend to have a set of rules that try to teach what is right and wrong according to the belief system of the particular religion.  For example, Christianity has the Ten Commandments. That lists what good Christians should and should not do with respect to the seven deadly sins.  Most religions have rules similar to these, and share similar moral beliefs.  However, what motivates these morals? Are these moral standards possibly more moral than atheist standards? The answer to the latter is no.  The motivation behind religious morals differ greatly depending on the religion and sometimes the person.  With the idea of the Ten Commandments in mind (or whatever set of rules are being followed), what is happening but obedience?  If theists blindly follow these rules set by deities, how can they be more moral according to the definition of morality?  That is not being moral.  Once again, morality is making a choice between right and wrong.  They are not choosing between right and wrong, but rather doing what they are told is acceptable to do.  According to Fred Klett’s “The Absurdity of Atheism”, “Unless God exists, there is no eternal and transcendent standard for right and wrong.”  The article continues to talk about the Ten Commandments and how they set a moral standard, and without them humanity is left to create its own standards.  Why is it that humans must rely on rules set forth by a deity to understand right and wrong?  This need not be based on rules sent by higher beings. Humans are capable of instinctually being moral, by the need for cooperation between them.  Therefore, what is so wrong with letting humans create their own moral code? Humans have shown that they can be moral without the rules given by a god.  Some theists follow the morals set by the higher being in order to gain access to heaven, or attain a good place in the afterlife, with no retrubution Theists follow the moral code, not only out of obedience, but also out of fear.  Theists can be told that “there is a God our there to whom you are accountable” and this incites fear(Klett,4).  Theists fear the eternal punishment that will be meted out at the time of judgment for their moral indiscretions.  This makes them ultimately less moral, in the sense that morality must be a decision made by a person for reasoning not based on fear.  People should not base their morals on a need to escape retribution by a divine being.  Not all theists base their morals on rules set by higher beings for fear of punishment, or out of blind obedience; however,  there is the majority that does and that is not real morality.
          Why are atheists viewed as being immoral and evil?  Generally, because they do not believe in a deity and are seen as therefore not understanding morals.  This is an incorrect assumption based on those who see religious morals as being the only way to live properly.  Atheists have many, pure reasons for being moral outside of a religion.  Humans are social creatures, according to The Secular Web, and therefore are discouraged from immoral behaviors out of a need for self-preservation and cooperation.  Self-preservation and cooperation are main reasons for morality amongst atheists.  Atheists believe that in order for society to be successful and in order for the human species to survive, morals must be upheld in a positive way.  Atheists also behave morally because of empathetic tendencies towards other humans.  They, even along with theists too, feel the need to be compassionate towards each other, therefore behaving morally.  However, even with theists that behave this way, atheists do this more often as a main reason for their morality.  Atheists generally do not believe in heaven  or an afterlife. Instead, they focus on this life.  This means that atheists live their lives and do their moral deeds without expecting eternal rewards from a deity.  This in theory makes atheists less selfish, in the sense that theists could act morally because they want rewards in the afterlife.  With the absence of belief in the afterlife, atheists live morally because they want to potentially help other humans before their lifetime is over.  They don’t live to improve their chances in heaven.  They behave morally to leave a lasting impact on the world that could aid those that come after; this is a pure moral in the sense that atheists only think of what they can do for other humans, and not of what can be done for them in return.  Atheism as a whole is more beneficial to morality.  According to Sam Harris in his article, “An Atheist Manifesto”, countries with a higher percentage of atheists tend to be healthier with lower homicide and infant mortality rates.  He also states that countries with higher religious populations tend to have higher rates in these areas, along with more societal dysfunction as a whole.  Therefore, religion does not do as much to ensure morality as people tend to think.  Morality is also more prominent in atheists in the sense that they live as if no one watches them, unlike theists.  Atheists are moral because of the above stated reasons, but also because they simply live their lives.  They don’t act morally because a supernatural being may or may not be watching and judging them from high above.  They act morally because they feel they should, and not because of the expectations of a supernatural power. 
          Atheists, with the lack of belief in deities or the afterlife, tend to have  a purer moral system than can be seen with theists.  Morality, in definition, is the ability to make the distinction between right and wrong and act accordingly.  Theists can be moral, generally speaking, but to the purposes that serve themselves.  Atheists and theists both have flaws with the ideas that shape their moral beliefs, but atheists can be moral without influence from rules of a deity, fear of retribution or punishment, or lust for an eternal afterlife full of rewards.  Those tend to be the reasons that influence theistic morality.  Each side has their own reasons for believing in the morals and ideals that they do.  This is not to say that neither has flaws, although atheism is more purely moral on the basis that the morals are only influenced by instincts for the preservation of humanity.

References
Klett, Fred (2012). The Absurdity of Atheism, 1-5. Retrieved from http://chaim.org/atheist.htm

The Secular Web (2007). An Introduction to Atheism. Retrieved from http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/mathew/intro.html

Harris, Sam (2005). An Atheist Manifesto. Retrieved from                      http://www.truthdig.com

Cline, Austin (2012). About.com. Myths on Atheism, Meaning, Morality: Atheists Lead Meaningless Lives of Despair. Retrieved from http://atheism.about.com/od/atheismmyths/p/AtheismMeaning.htm?p=1

Cline, Austin (2012). About.com. Flaws in Theistic, Religious Morality: Religion, Theism aren't Needed for Values. Retrieved from


Chamberlain, Paul (1996). Can We Be Good Without God?  A Conversation About Truth, Morality, Culture & a Few Other Things That Matter. Downers Grove, Illinois. InterVarsity Press.

 

Epstein, Greg (2009). Good Without God: What A Billion Nonreligious People Do Believe. New York, New York. HarperCollins Publishers.



No comments:

Post a Comment